Start free trial

The trick: Narrowed Superlative

Anthropic says Claude discovered a CRISPR-like enzyme system.

Its own post says the function is not yet known, The Next Web reports all ten reruns of the search missed the array, and a Copenhagen researcher says his unpublished work describes the same finding.

Issue 4212 October 202624 receipts3 min
AI illustration for: Anthropic says Claude discovered a CRISPR-like enzyme system. Its own post says the function is not yet known, The Next Web reports all ten reruns of the search missed the array, and a Copenhagen researcher says his unpublished work describes the same finding.
AI illustration

On 23 September Anthropic said Claude discovered a novel enzyme system with properties reminiscent of CRISPR, with only high-level direction from its scientists. Dario Amodei called it a Claude-led discovery of a molecular machine that Anthropic suspects could represent a new gene editing mechanism, in a post quoted by CNN's report carried by WCPO.

Before you read on. Your call?

Anthropic's own post says its work to understand the primary function is ongoing, and The Next Web reports the preprint has not yet shown the enzyme is active. The post also says the underlying enzyme had been identified in previous studies.

The twist

The Next Web reports Anthropic ran the same search ten more times and all ten missed the array. And Mario Rodríguez Mestre, a University of Copenhagen doctoral researcher, told CNN his unpublished research describes the same viral signatures, while saying he cannot demonstrate that Anthropic took his work. Anthropic did not respond to CNN's request for comment.

There’s more to this story.

Membership opens the full investigation, the strongest counterargument and what to do with what you’ve learned.

30 days free, then A$89 a year. Payment card required. Cancel before the trial ends to avoid the first charge.

Review my 30-day free trial →
  1. At sign-up: 30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.
  2. Your trial ends 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage subscription, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.
  3. You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing hello@bskiller.com. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Already a member? Sign in

The trick has a name

We call it Narrowed Superlative: first or fastest, inside a quietly narrowed category. You'll see it again. Learn to spot it →

Say this in tomorrow's meeting“Anthropic's own post says what its CRISPR-like enzyme system does is not yet known. The Next Web reports ten reruns of the search missed it, and a Copenhagen researcher says his unpublished work describes the same finding.”

Receipts

  1. Supports anthropic.com: Claude discovered a novel enzyme system with properties reminiscent of CRISPR, with only high-level direction from our scientists.
  2. Supports wcpo.com: Today we announced the Claude-led discovery of a molecular machine that we suspect could represent a new gene editing mechanism
  3. Context anthropic.com: Our work to understand the primary function of ARTs is ongoing.
  4. Context anthropic.com: Although we don't yet know its function
  5. Refutes thenextweb.com: The preprint says the team has not yet shown that the enzyme is active, or that it works on these RNAs.
  6. Context anthropic.com: While this underlying RT, found in a jumbo phage, had been identified in previous studies
  7. Context anthropic.com: Claude appears to be the first to notice the system's defining features
  8. Refutes thenextweb.com: Anthropic ran the same campaign ten more times. No rerun read the DNA upstream of the enzyme, and all ten missed the array.
  9. Refutes wcpo.com: It is essentially the same finding.
  10. Context wcpo.com: I am not claiming that Anthropic deliberately took our work. I cannot demonstrate that
  11. Context wcpo.com: Anthropic did not respond to an emailed request to comment.
  12. Context anthropic.com: Our involvement was limited to the initial prompt and the lab work
  13. Context anthropic.com: After 21 hours spent searching this data by roughly 950 agents using 210 million tokens
  14. Context anthropic.com: genuinely intriguing and merits further investigation
  15. Context wcpo.com: It's not unusual in the scientific process for different research groups to converge on the same result
  16. Context wcpo.com: many scientists may think twice in the future about inputting their unpublished results into these tools
  17. Context anthropic.com: an associated array of non-coding DNA sequences and an additional accessory protein of unknown function
  18. Context wcpo.com: Either information related to our work somehow reached the model and it was trained on it. The second possibility, which I currently think is more plausible, is that there was considerably more prior scientific knowledge and human direction behind the search than the phrase 'autonomous discovery' suggests
  19. Context anthropic.com: After reviewing the pre-print, Feng Zhang, one of the pioneers of CRISPR genome editing and a professor at MIT and the Broad Institute, said
  20. Refutes wcpo.com: just days after Anthropic's announcement, Mario Rodríguez Mestre, who said he used Claude extensively for his recently completed doctoral research at the University of Copenhagen, claimed his unpublished research describes the same viral signatures
  21. Context wcpo.com: Dario Amodei, the chief executive of Anthropic, said on social media
  22. Context anthropic.com: one of the agents spotted something remarkable: a repeating pattern of DNA sequences that occurs next to the gene for an odd-looking RT
  23. Context anthropic.com: We're introducing a new life sciences research group and laboratory at Anthropic.
  24. Context anthropic.com: we think it is important to share such findings early

Open the Receipts Pack → What each source proves, every figure traced, and what would change our verdict.

Get tomorrow's check in your inbox.

One AI claim a night, checked against independent sources, receipts attached. Free.

Free email updates. Unsubscribe any time.

This story is a stable, citable object. If you can falsify a verdict,tell us. Corrections are loud here.