Start free trial

TRUE, BUTSelf-Marked

On the scorecard the robot's maker wrote.

“Dyna-2, pre-trained on 1M+ hours of human video, passes 87% of a new customer site's quality bar zero-shot, with no site-specific retraining.”

Dyna Robotics, 10 August 2026

Recorded 12 August 2026. Our ruling means: literally true, materially misleading.

Read the story →

Receipts pack

The evidence file for this verdict

4 receipts: 1 support the claim, 1 contradict it, 2 add context. 3 figures on the record, 2 traced to a quoted receipt.

The receipts

Each source, the line we quote from it, its date and which way it cuts. Free to read and to cite.

  1. 1Supports the claimdyna.co ↗

    Dyna-1 passes 46% and Dyna-2 passes 87%

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  2. 2Contextdyna.co ↗

    throughput and reliability the customer site requires

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  3. 3Contradicts the claimexplainx.ai ↗

    Every number here is vendor-published and self-evaluated as of August 11, 2026.

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  4. 4Contextinterestingengineering.com ↗

    could later be adapted to different platforms with only a few hours of local fine-tuning

    Look up an archived copy ↗

Members' extras

What each receipt proves, and what would change our mind.

  • What each receipt above proves, in our words
  • The figures table, each number traced to the receipt that states it
  • The trick behind the claim, explained, with the guide to spotting it
  • What would change our verdict
  • Our call on the record, with its due date

The verdict, the opening and every receipt above stay free. Membership adds our analysis to the evidence file for every checked story.

See Membership →Already a member? Sign in →

First membership: 30 days free, then A$89 a year. One introductory trial per customer. Card required; renews annually until cancelled. Cancel before the trial ends to avoid the first charge.