Start free trial

TRUE, BUTBorrowed Engine

It calls GPT-5.5 to do the work

Its own paper says the model calls GPT-5.5 to do the work.

“Faraday, a 27-billion-parameter 'AI Scientist' from Inherent Labs, outperforms Claude Opus 4.8 and GPT-5.5 on the task of replicating research papers.”

Inherent Labs (Edward Hughes, co-founder and chief scientist), 22 August 2026

Recorded 25 August 2026. Our ruling means: literally true, materially misleading.

Read the story →

Receipts pack

The evidence file for this verdict

6 receipts: 2 support the claim, 3 contradict it, 1 add context. 5 figures on the record, 1 traced to a quoted receipt.

The receipts

Each source, the line we quote from it, its date and which way it cuts. Free to read and to cite.

  1. 1Contradicts the claimarxiv.org ↗

    Faraday is provided with a frontier coding agent to use as a tool. A wrapper script runs the Codex CLI non-interactively.

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  2. 2Contradicts the claimarxiv.org ↗

    GPT-5.5 in the final stage and for evaluation

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  3. 3Contradicts the claimaiweekly.co ↗

    Faraday is built on a 27-billion-parameter Qwen base and calls OpenAI's GPT-5.5 Codex for coding subtasks.

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  4. 4Contextsuperpowerdaily.com ↗

    The disclosed evaluation includes no numerical scores, named test papers or methodology, limiting what can be concluded from the comparison.

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  5. 5Supports the claimtechcrunch.com ↗

    What was most interesting to us about this was not so much the result of beating those frontier agents

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  6. 6Supports the claiminherentlabs.ai ↗

    a 27B-parameter "AI scientist" agent that outperforms Claude Opus 4.8 and GPT-5.5 on the task of replicating research

    Look up an archived copy ↗

Members' extras

What each receipt proves, and what would change our mind.

  • What each receipt above proves, in our words
  • The figures table, each number traced to the receipt that states it
  • The trick behind the claim, explained, with the guide to spotting it
  • What would change our verdict
  • Our call on the record, with its due date

The verdict, the opening and every receipt above stay free. Membership adds our analysis to the evidence file for every checked story.

First membership: 30 days free, then A$89 a year. One introductory trial per customer. Card required; renews annually until cancelled. Cancel before the trial ends to avoid the first charge.