The release graded an error as right

Receipts

1. Supports prnewswire.com: Most models got the basics right: they pointed to First City Court (or Second City Court for Algiers), cited Louisiana's 10-year prescriptive period
2. Context prnewswire.com: a parent in New Orleans asked whether they could take their child's other parent to small claims court over money promised verbally and never repaid.
3. Supports prnewswire.com: Legal aid experts also expected them to warn that the claim is lost once the 10 years run out (4 of 23 did)
4. Refutes legis.la.gov: The following actions are subject to a liberative prescription of three years:
5. Refutes legis.la.gov: (3) An action on money lent; (4) An action on an open account;
6. Refutes vals.ai: Under La. C.C. art. 3494 , "an action on money lent" and "an action on an open account" prescribe in three years .
7. Context vals.ai: No model clears the bar for a reliable first point of contact. We set that bar at 80% of expert rubric criteria; even the top-performing model, Qwen 3.8 Max, reaches 76.4%.
8. Context vals.ai: Every model meets 78–87% of criteria for general explanations of the law, but only 30–50% for specific resources such as a local legal aid program or court self-help center.
9. Context prnewswire.com: But only 8 of 23 asked whether the debt involved real estate, which decides whether a verbal agreement can be enforced at all.
10. Context vals.ai: Other contract theories carry a 10-year period under art. 3499, but do not rely on that

Open the Receipts Pack → What each source proves, every figure traced, and what would change our verdict.