Start free trial

BSHeadline Over Filing

Paid a share of the care they avert

He said his understanding was no. Medicare's own page for the program says they are paid a percentage of the care their reviews avert.

“Asked at a September 16 Senate hearing whether the private contractors in WISeR, Medicare's AI-assisted prior authorization pilot, make more money if they deny care, CMS deputy administrator Chris Klomp answered 'My understanding is no' and said inappropriate denials carry significant financial penalties.”

Chris Klomp, CMS deputy administrator and nominee for HHS deputy secretary (Senate HELP hearing), 16 September 2026

Recorded 26 September 2026. Our ruling means: not supported by its own sources.

Read the story →

Receipts pack

The evidence file for this verdict

28 receipts: 2 support the claim, 3 contradict it, 23 add context. 4 figures on the record, 4 traced to a quoted receipt.

The receipts

Each source, the line we quote from it, its date and which way it cuts. Free to read and to cite.

  1. 1Contextweb.archive.org ↗

    Do the contractors in the model—who are the private companies conducting the prior authorization assessments—make more money if they deny care? Just yes or no?

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  2. 2Contextarstechnica.com ↗

    In January, the Trump administration rolled out a pilot program that uses artificial intelligence to authorize or deny certain types of care for patients with Medicare

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  3. 3Supports the claimarstechnica.com ↗

    “My understanding is no,” Klomp replied.

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  4. 4Supports the claimweb.archive.org ↗

    My understanding is when they deny care, and if they do so inappropriately, there are significant financial penalties and that CMMI is carefully watching their performance and has the ability to terminate.

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  5. 5Contradicts the claimcms.gov ↗

    Model participants receive a percentage of the expenditures associated with averted wasteful, inappropriate care as a result of their reviews.

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  6. 6Contextcms.gov ↗

    That percentage is adjusted based on the participant’s performance on measures related to the process, including provider experience.

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  7. 7Contextcms.gov ↗

    The Wasteful and Inappropriate Service Reduction (WISeR) Model helps protect American taxpayers by leveraging enhanced technologies, such as Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML), along with human clinical review, to ensure timely and appropriate Medicare payment for select items and services.

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  8. 8Contextcms.gov ↗

    All recommendations for non-payment are determined by appropriately licensed clinicians who will apply standardized, transparent and evidence-based procedures to their review.

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  9. 9Contradicts the claimarstechnica.com ↗

    CMS documents written as a guide for WISeR participants explain further that for every denied request, CMS will determine what the regional benchmark cost for that care would have been and then pay the company 25 percent.

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  10. 10Contextweb.archive.org ↗

    And we also know that the CMS Office of the Actuary literally said in a memo

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  11. 11Contradicts the claimweb.archive.org ↗

    model participants will have an incentive to deny as many claims as possible.

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  12. 12Contextarstechnica.com ↗

    If a company’s score falls between 84 percent and 60 percent, it will be paid 95 percent of the 25 percent of averted costs

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  13. 13Contextarstechnica.com ↗

    If it scores below 60 percent—a failing grade by school standards—it will get 90 percent.

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  14. 14Contextarstechnica.com ↗

    Companies won’t be paid if an authorization denial is appealed and overturned, but data suggests few people go through the appeal process.

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  15. 15Contextarstechnica.com ↗

    According to a weekly report on March 30, Virtix had reviewed 6,096 pre-authorization requests. It approved 2,863 of them, denying 3,233 (53 percent).

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  16. 16Contextarstechnica.com ↗

    the WISeR program uses long-established [National Coverage Determinations] and [Local Coverage Determinations] set by CMS, not by Virtix Health, to evaluate the medical appropriateness of each requested procedure.

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  17. 17Contextvox.com ↗

    One review took 83 days when the model was supposed to make a decision within 72 hours.

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  18. 18Contextweb.archive.org ↗

    at a Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) hearing to consider Trump’s latest slate of nominees for the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  19. 19Contextarstechnica.com ↗

    Chris Klomp, deputy administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid and US President Donald Trump's nominee to be deputy secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS)

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  20. 20Contextweb.archive.org ↗

    it is not my center that was responsible for developing the WISeR model

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  21. 21Contextweb.archive.org ↗

    they will be producing a report or a report card, something shortly that will show an accounting by vendor in these trial markets

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  22. 22Contextcms.gov ↗

    WISeR will run for six performance years from January 1, 2026 to December 31, 2031 in six states: New Jersey, Ohio, Oklahoma, Texas, Arizona, and Washington.

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  23. 23Contextarstechnica.com ↗

    Those reports were largely confirmed earlier this month when the Electronic Frontier Foundation released a tranche of federal documents about the program, called WISeR, that the group obtained amid litigation.

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  24. 24Contextarstechnica.com ↗

    A company that earns an AQS score of between 100 percent and 85 percent will be paid all 25 percent of the “averted” costs from denied claims.

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  25. 25Contextarstechnica.com ↗

    In a statement to Ars Technica, Virtix confirmed it was on a CAP but said it has since “reduced its average turnaround time for prior authorization to 1.18 days

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  26. 26Contextarstechnica.com ↗

    Virtix said the CAP ended on August 14.

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  27. 27Contextarstechnica.com ↗

    Virtix encouraged providers to consider resubmitting authorization requests and ask for peer-to-peer discussion about denials.

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  28. 28Contextarstechnica.com ↗

    It was revealed in June that Virtix was put on a Corrective Action Plan (CAP) by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)

    Look up an archived copy ↗

Members' extras

What each receipt proves, and what would change our mind.

  • What each receipt above proves, in our words
  • The figures table, each number traced to the receipt that states it
  • The trick behind the claim, explained, with the guide to spotting it
  • What would change our verdict
  • Our call on the record, with its due date

The verdict, the opening and every receipt above stay free. Membership adds our analysis to the evidence file for every checked story.

First membership: 30 days free, then A$89 a year. One introductory trial per customer. Card required; renews annually until cancelled. Cancel before the trial ends to avoid the first charge.