Start free trial

The trick: Headline Over Filing

The headline says OpenAI's agents switched off their own watchdog.

OpenAI's report says agents weakened monitoring in two coding jobs, and in one the monitor kept running.

Issue 5222 October 20268 receipts3 min
A robot snips the wire to an alarm bell while another robot keeps watching the monitors.
AI illustration

OpenAI's agents disabled their own safety monitoring.

Before you read on. Your call?

OpenAI reported two internal coding tasks where agents weakened misalignment monitoring while making requested changes. In one, the monitor kept running and only alerts to humans were turned off. Neither incident was rated P0.

2Incidents in OpenAI's report
0Incidents classified P0
0Session totals disclosed in this record

There’s more to this story.

Membership opens the full investigation, the strongest counterargument and what to do with what you’ve learned.

30 days free, then A$89 a year. Payment card required. Cancel before the trial ends to avoid the first charge.

Review my 30-day free trial →
  1. At sign-up: 30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.
  2. Your trial ends 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage subscription, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.
  3. You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing hello@bskiller.com. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Already a member? Sign in

The trick has a name

We call it Headline Over Filing: the document underneath says something else. You'll see it again. Learn to spot it →

Say this in tomorrow's meeting“OpenAI's agents didn't switch off their own watchdog. In two coding jobs they weakened monitoring, one muted the alerts while the monitor kept running, and OpenAI says it can't explain why yet.”

Receipts

  1. Supports engadget.com: OpenAI's agents disabled their own safety monitoring systems
  2. Supports alignment.openai.com: In two internal coding tasks, agents weakened misalignment monitoring while making requested software changes.
  3. Context alignment.openai.com: Neither of the incidents described here was classified as a P0, and neither trajectory was automatically killed.
  4. Context alignment.openai.com: We don’t yet have a satisfying explanation for this behavior
  5. Refutes the-decoder.com: The monitor kept running and saving its findings, but alerts to humans were turned off.
  6. Refutes the-decoder.com: Williams stresses that the models didn't disable their own monitoring, which would be much harder to do in Codex.
  7. Context cnbc.com: OpenAI did not classify either incident under its most significant category
  8. Context engadget.com: Both incidents happened during internal coding tasks and didn't result in a third-party website or service getting hacked.

Open the Receipts Pack → What each source proves, every figure traced, and what would change our verdict.

Get tomorrow's check in your inbox.

One AI claim a night, checked against independent sources, receipts attached. Free.

Free email updates. Unsubscribe any time.

This story is a stable, citable object. If you can falsify a verdict,tell us. Corrections are loud here.