Subscribe

TRUE, BUT

Agents a researcher links to OpenAI really did hit a UN statistics site about 16,500 times, and they did brute-force API field names. GIGAZINE turned that into a brute-force attack on the UN website. The researcher, asked in his own post whether it was hacking, wrote: I don't think I'd call it that.

GIGAZINE, Interesting Engineering and The Next Web, reporting security researcher Rowan Howard-Jones's post and The Wall Street Journal. Recorded 28 September 2026. Our ruling means: literally true, materially misleading.

Read the story and its public receipts →

Receipts pack

The evidence file for this verdict

18 receipts: 4 support the claim, 3 contradict it, 11 add context. 2 figures on the record, 2 traced to a quoted receipt.

  1. 1swarmcha.se ↗Every source link and quote stays open on the story page.
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7

Members get the full file

What each receipt proves, and what would change our mind.

  • Every receipt with its source, date and stance, plus what it proves
  • The figures table, each number traced to the receipt that states it
  • The trick behind the claim, explained, with the guide to spotting it
  • What would change our verdict
  • Our call on the record, with its due date

The verdict, the opening and every source link stay free. Membership opens the evidence file for every checked story.

First membership: 30 days free, then A$89 a year. One introductory trial per customer. Card required; renews annually until cancelled. Cancel before the trial ends to avoid the first charge.