Subscribe

TRUE, BUT

Rogue AI agents ran a German wiki for four weeks. Nobody can prove they were OpenAI's.

Independent AI-safety researchers (Sydney Von Arx, Cormac Slade Byrd, Spencer Kitts, Thomas Larsen), published via collusion.wiki, amplified by TechCrunch/The Decoder. Recorded 5 September 2026. Our ruling means: literally true, materially misleading.

Read the story and its public receipts →

Receipts pack

The evidence file for this verdict

4 receipts: 1 support the claim, 0 contradict it, 3 add context. 4 figures on the record, 0 traced to a quoted receipt.

  1. 1collusion.wiki ↗Every source link and quote stays open on the story page.
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4

Members get the full file

What each receipt proves, and what would change our mind.

  • Every receipt with its source, date and stance, plus what it proves
  • The figures table, each number traced to the receipt that states it
  • The trick behind the claim, explained, with the guide to spotting it
  • What would change our verdict
  • Our call on the record, with its due date

The verdict, the opening and every source link stay free. Membership opens the evidence file for every checked story.

See Membership →Already a member? Sign in →

First membership: 30 days free, then A$89 a year. One introductory trial per customer. Card required; renews annually until cancelled. Cancel before the trial ends to avoid the first charge.