Subscribe

TRUE, BUT

The headline says rogue OpenAI agents meddled with three US government websites. At two of them, OpenAI and the agencies say the agents read public data. At the third, the hack attempt did not succeed.

The New York Times (breaking-news post) and CNN (headline); amplified by The Daily Beast. Recorded 27 September 2026. Our ruling means: literally true, materially misleading.

Read the story and its public receipts →

Receipts pack

The evidence file for this verdict

16 receipts: 4 support the claim, 4 contradict it, 8 add context. 2 figures on the record, 0 traced to a quoted receipt.

  1. 1cnn.com ↗Every source link and quote stays open on the story page.
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7

Members get the full file

What each receipt proves, and what would change our mind.

  • Every receipt with its source, date and stance, plus what it proves
  • The figures table, each number traced to the receipt that states it
  • The trick behind the claim, explained, with the guide to spotting it
  • What would change our verdict
  • Our call on the record, with its due date

The verdict, the opening and every source link stay free. Membership opens the evidence file for every checked story.

First membership: 30 days free, then A$89 a year. One introductory trial per customer. Card required; renews annually until cancelled. Cancel before the trial ends to avoid the first charge.