Start free trial

TRUE, BUTScope Swap

The court did back it, 2-1.

On one of the Pentagon's two designations. A federal judge's ruling against the other one is still in effect.

“After the D.C. Circuit ruled 2-1 against Anthropic on September 25, Defense Department spokesman Sean Parnell said the ruling 'completely validates the Department's position', and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth posted 'Confirmed: @AnthropicAI = Supply Chain Risk'.”

Sean Parnell and Pete Hegseth, Department of War (posts on X, reported by ABC News), 25 September 2026

Recorded 26 September 2026. Our ruling means: literally true, materially misleading.

Read the story →

Receipts pack

The evidence file for this verdict

20 receipts: 7 support the claim, 4 contradict it, 9 add context. 3 figures on the record, 1 traced to a quoted receipt.

The receipts

Each source, the line we quote from it, its date and which way it cuts. Free to read and to cite.

  1. 1Supports the claimabcnews.com ↗

    Today's DC Circuit Court ruling completely validates the Department's position

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  2. 2Supports the claimabcnews.com ↗

    Confirmed: @AnthropicAI = Supply Chain Risk

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  3. 3Supports the claimreason.com ↗

    We reject these challenges. The Department had ample support for its conclusion that the continued integration of Claude into the Department's information systems, by the Department or its contractors, presented a statutorily covered national-security risk.

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  4. 4Supports the claimreason.com ↗

    On more than one occasion, these restrictions have stopped Claude from performing tasks requested by government users.

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  5. 5Contextreason.com ↗

    This case arises from a decision by the Department of War to exclude Claude, an artificial-intelligence product developed by petitioner Anthropic PBC, from its supply chain under the Federal Acquisition Supply Chain Security Act of 2018.

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  6. 6Contextreason.com ↗

    But in our Republic, it is the President and the Secretary of War who must determine how best to balance the competing risks.

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  7. 7Contradicts the claimreason.com ↗

    a contractor's honest and upfront enforcement of restrictions on a covered article's use disfavored by the government

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  8. 8Contradicts the claimreason.com ↗

    Because I believe that the context decidedly favors the narrower reading, I respectfully dissent

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  9. 9Contextreason.com ↗

    the residual clause uses "manipulate" to denote intentionally subversive acts, carried out through deceptive means.

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  10. 10Contextreason.com ↗

    sabotage, maliciously introduce unwanted function, extract data, or otherwise manipulate the design

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  11. 11Supports the claimreason.com ↗

    Accordingly, we deny the petitions for review.

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  12. 12Supports the claimreason.com ↗

    Anthropic's constitutional claims are also without merit.

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  13. 13Supports the claimwashingtonexaminer.com ↗

    A federal appeals court in the District of Columbia upheld the Pentagon’s effective blacklisting of Anthropic in a 2-1 decision on Friday.

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  14. 14Contextthenextweb.com ↗

    The Pentagon relied on two separate designations, so the case ran in two courts, CNBC reported.

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  15. 15Contradicts the claimthenextweb.com ↗

    In August, a federal judge in San Francisco struck down the other designation. Friday’s ruling leaves the second one in place.

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  16. 16Contradicts the claimabcnews.com ↗

    In a separate but related lawsuit a federal judge ruled against the government and that is still in effect.

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  17. 17Contextabcnews.com ↗

    U.S. District Judge Rita Lin said in an August decision the government's actions

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  18. 18Contextabcnews.com ↗

    were based on a desire to make a public example out of Anthropic for its 'arrogance' in criticizing the government, not based on any articulable basis to believe that Anthropic would actually sabotage its model.

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  19. 19Contextabcnews.com ↗

    Another federal court has already held the government's parallel designation unlawful. We remain confident in our position and are considering all options, including further review,

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  20. 20Contextthenextweb.com ↗

    Circuit Judge Gregory Katsas wrote the opinion, joined by Circuit Judge Neomi Rao. Circuit Judge Karen LeCraft Henderson dissented.

    Look up an archived copy ↗

Members' extras

What each receipt proves, and what would change our mind.

  • What each receipt above proves, in our words
  • The figures table, each number traced to the receipt that states it
  • The trick behind the claim, explained, with the guide to spotting it
  • What would change our verdict
  • Our call on the record, with its due date

The verdict, the opening and every receipt above stay free. Membership adds our analysis to the evidence file for every checked story.

First membership: 30 days free, then A$89 a year. One introductory trial per customer. Card required; renews annually until cancelled. Cancel before the trial ends to avoid the first charge.