Start free trial

TRUE, BUTLab Not Field

They got it 3 to 15% of the time

A new blind benchmark handed seven of them a paper's reference list, scrubbed of anything they could have memorized, and asked for the paper's core idea. They got it 3 to 15 percent of the time.

“Frontier AI models can do genuine scientific reasoning and generate real research ideas, the capability labs increasingly market as AI accelerating science.”

The 'AI as scientific research partner' narrative (frontier labs, August 2026), tested by the Reconstruction benchmark

Recorded 20 August 2026. Our ruling means: literally true, materially misleading.

Read the story →

Receipts pack

The evidence file for this verdict

6 receipts: 1 support the claim, 2 contradict it, 3 add context. 4 figures on the record, 2 traced to a quoted receipt.

The receipts

Each source, the line we quote from it, its date and which way it cuts. Free to read and to cite.

  1. 1Contradicts the claimarxiv.org ↗

    Across six scientific domains and 643 evaluated papers, seven frontier models achieve only modest Match rates (approx. 3-15%).

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  2. 2Supports the claimarxiv.org ↗

    Cross-model review plus tournament selection raises Match rates to approx. 23-42% across all six domains, which is an observed approx. 2.4x lift over the best single-model baseline.

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  3. 3Contextarxiv.org ↗

    We introduce Reconstruction, a blind idea-recovery benchmark that withholds the seed paper and all contemporaneous or future literature

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  4. 4Contradicts the claimtechtimes.com ↗

    Solo scores of three to fifteen percent on a contamination-resistant task

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  5. 5Contexttechtimes.com ↗

    tests seven frontier models against 643 papers across six scientific domains

    Look up an archived copy ↗

  6. 6Contextemergentmind.com ↗

    combines cross-model review with a Swiss tournament over aligned hypothesis slots, without external web search

    Look up an archived copy ↗

Members' extras

What each receipt proves, and what would change our mind.

  • What each receipt above proves, in our words
  • The figures table, each number traced to the receipt that states it
  • The trick behind the claim, explained, with the guide to spotting it
  • What would change our verdict
  • Our call on the record, with its due date

The verdict, the opening and every receipt above stay free. Membership adds our analysis to the evidence file for every checked story.

First membership: 30 days free, then A$89 a year. One introductory trial per customer. Card required; renews annually until cancelled. Cancel before the trial ends to avoid the first charge.