The trick: Lab Not Field
Ten minutes of AI erodes your ability to persist, Berkeley's headline says.
The study measured skipped problems on a paid online task, three test problems each, and its largest trial found the skip gap was not significant.
Berkeley News headlined that using AI for just 10 minutes erodes your ability to persist at hard things.
Before you read on. Your call?
TRUE, BUT
667 recruited
Free with your account
Sign in for this free check.
This edition’s selected free story opens after sign-in.
The twist
The paper says the persistence cost appears concentrated among people who asked the AI for direct answers.
There’s more to this story.
Membership opens the full investigation, the strongest counterargument and what to do with what you’ve learned.
30 days free, then A$89 a year. Payment card required. Cancel before the trial ends to avoid the first charge.
Review my 30-day free trial →- At sign-up: 30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.
- Your trial ends 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage subscription, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.
- You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing hello@bskiller.com. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.
By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.
BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.
Get tomorrow’s check free by email.
Couldn't check your access. That's on us.
The trick has a name
We call it Lab Not Field: it works in the test conditions, not the deployed ones. You'll see it again. Learn to spot it →
Receipts
- Supports news.berkeley.edu:
Using AI for just 10 minutes erodes your ability to persist at hard things
- Supports news.berkeley.edu:
Whereas the AI users got answers wrong or gave up entirely when the AI assistance was withdrawn, the group without AI stuck with the task
- Context news.berkeley.edu:
designed a series of randomized controlled trials and recruited 1,222 participants online
- Supports news.berkeley.edu:
You almost couldn’t ask for a clearer story
- Supports arxiv.org:
we find that although AI assistance improves performance in the short-term, people perform significantly worse without AI and are more likely to give up
- Supports arxiv.org:
Notably, these effects emerge after only brief interactions with AI (approximately 10 minutes).
- Context arxiv.org:
participants were asked to solve 3 additional fraction problems
- Context arxiv.org:
We recruited 667 US-based participants from the online research platform Prolific and paid them $3.40 for participation
- Refutes arxiv.org:
but the result was not significant
- Context arxiv.org:
Persistence costs are concentrated among those who obtain direct solutions
- Context arxiv.org:
their payment didn’t depend on how many questions they solve correctly
- Context arxiv.org:
our study took approximately 13 minutes to complete
- Supports psychologytoday.com:
Ten minutes of AI use erodes the persistence that 10,000 hours demands.
- Supports psychologytoday.com:
Not after months of dependency. After a single brief interaction.
Open the Receipts Pack → What each source proves, every figure traced, and what would change our verdict.
