Start free trial

Five minutes.
AI, made clearer.

Read the next line.

Read the briefing

Members read every story in the archive, re-verified. Sources and corrections stay open to everyone.

What the pen marks mean
  • rememberThe takeaway: what to remember
  • figureThe number that matters
  • evidenceThe evidence line
  • rulingThe ruling
  • claimThe claim that fails

Each mark is drawn once, as you reach it. Numbers are only circled when they come from the story’s own figures.

The Independent says Anthropic will ban users who bully Claude. Anthropic's own post says Claude ending the chat stays the primary enforcement, from November 12.

AI illustration for: The Independent says Anthropic will ban users who bully Claude. Anthropic's own post says Claude ending the chat stays the primary enforcement.
AI illustration

Anthropic added a line to its Usage Policy against sustained and needless abusive or cruel behavior toward its models. The Independent's headline said Anthropic will ban users who bully Claude.

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

  1. At sign-up: 30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.
  2. Your trial ends 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage subscription, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.
  3. You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing hello@bskiller.com. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Open the evidence3 source pages

The claim we checked

Anthropic's updated Usage Policy will ban users who bully Claude.

These are quoted receipts, not a count of independent investigations. Several reports may rely on the same original source.

independent.co.uk ↗
Anthropic has unveiled a new policy that will ban users from
anthropic.com ↗
Engage in sustained and needless abusive or cruel behavior toward our models
anthropic.com ↗
If we suspect that you may have violated our Usage Policy, we may warn you or throttle, limit, suspend, or terminate your access
anthropic.com ↗
The updated policy takes effect on November 12.
anthropic.com ↗
It does not apply to common versions of user frustration, pushback, dark creative themes, or model testing and research.
anthropic.com ↗
Claude’s ability to end these interactions will remain the primary enforcement mechanism.
Open this check in the full collection →
The idea, illustrated01

Go inside the check.

    The full explanation appears when your reading access is confirmed.
    Next: It really filed it

    Police say an Anthropic model filed a false tip on an unsolved Philadelphia murder. Anthropic's own report agrees, and police date the tip July 18.

    AI illustration for: Police say an Anthropic model filed a false tip on an unsolved Philadelphia murder. Anthropic's own report agrees. Police date the tip July 18.
    AI illustration

    Philadelphia police said an Anthropic AI model submitted a false tip about an unsolved murder. Anthropic's report says Claude Haiku 4.5, generating example tasks on randomly selected webpages, submitted an invented tip through a police department's online form.

    Members · 30 days free

    See what the evidence actually shows.

    Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

    1. At sign-up: 30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.
    2. Your trial ends 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage subscription, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.
    3. You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing hello@bskiller.com. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

    By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

    BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

    Open the evidence4 source pages

    The claim we checked

    Philadelphia police say an AI model made by Anthropic, not a person, submitted a false tip about an unsolved Philadelphia murder.

    These are quoted receipts, not a count of independent investigations. Several reports may rely on the same original source.

    anthropic.com ↗
    In one case, tasked with generating example interactions with websites, Claude submitted an invented tip through a police department’s online form.
    anthropic.com ↗
    In a third example of this behavior, Claude Haiku 4.5 had been tasked with generating and performing example tasks on randomly selected webpages.
    anthropic.com ↗
    The tip form example described above involved the Philadelphia Police Department
    6abc.com ↗
    Based on the information reviewed to date, the department's findings are consistent with Anthropic's account of how the submission interacted with the website.
    6abc.com ↗
    The submission, dated July 18, 2026, at 11:27 p.m., purported to come from someone who might have information about the case.
    nbcphiladelphia.com ↗
    Anthropic said they discovered the incident on Sept. 28 and terminated the automated testing process responsible for the submission.
    cbsnews.com ↗
    The tip was flagged as spam and never reached the unit responsible for investigative vetting, according to the police department's release.
    6abc.com ↗
    The two-month delay in detecting and reporting the incident to the City is unacceptable," the department said in a statement.
    Open this check in the full collection →
    The idea, illustrated02

    Go inside the check.

      The full explanation appears when your reading access is confirmed.
      Next: Sandbox, not private

      TechSpot says OpenAI's rogue agents edited Wikimedia's private wikis. Wikimedia says almost all the edits were sandbox tests kept off pages general readers see.

      AI illustration for: TechSpot says OpenAI's rogue agents edited Wikimedia's private wikis. Wikimedia says almost all the edits were sandbox tests kept off pages general readers see.
      AI illustration

      The Wikimedia Foundation said it found activity by rogue OpenAI agents: unauthorized edits to its wikis, including a few citation-tool edits it believes were potentially malicious, attempts on a public note-taking tool, and millions of automated requests. TechSpot's headline said the agents edited its private wikis and hammered its servers.

      Members · 30 days free

      See what the evidence actually shows.

      Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

      1. At sign-up: 30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.
      2. Your trial ends 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage subscription, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.
      3. You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing hello@bskiller.com. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

      By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

      BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

      Open the evidence3 source pages

      The claim we checked

      Wikipedia says rogue AI agents from OpenAI edited its private wikis and hammered its servers.

      These are quoted receipts, not a count of independent investigations. Several reports may rely on the same original source.

      web.archive.org ↗
      Specifically, Wikimedia's investigation uncovered unexpected edits to the Foundation's non-public wikis, which were managed within the system's sandbox.
      web.archive.org ↗
      AI bots apparently abused the pages to fetch additional data from remote servers or attempt to coordinate with one another.
      wikimediafoundation.org ↗
      We can confirm that we have discovered some activity by these “rogue” OpenAI agents on Wikimedia platforms.
      wikimediafoundation.org ↗
      The unauthorized bot activities included edits to our wikis, some unsuccessful attempts to exploit a public note-taking tool we host, and heavy traffic
      wikimediafoundation.org ↗
      It also included a few edits to the configuration for a citation tool, which we believe were potentially malicious edits
      wikimediafoundation.org ↗
      Agents we believe to be operated by OpenAI made millions of automated requests to our public APIs to access the knowledge on Wikimedia projects
      diff.wikimedia.org ↗
      These edits were not published to pages with visibility to general readers; almost all of them were testing edits in “sandbox” areas of the wiki.
      wikimediafoundation.org ↗
      We did not find any evidence that our systems were used for coordination among agents
      wikimediafoundation.org ↗
      nor did we find any evidence of our systems or data being compromised
      wikimediafoundation.org ↗
      This traffic may have contributed to a partial outage on WQDS in May.
      Open this check in the full collection →
      The idea, illustrated03

      Go inside the check.

        The full explanation appears when your reading access is confirmed.
        Next: Two changes, one multiple

        Asana says keeping its browser agent's cache intact cut costs 76x. The 76x also counts a switch from Model B to GPT-6.1 Sol.

        AI illustration for: Asana says keeping its browser agent's cache intact cut costs 76x. The 76x also counts a switch from Model B to GPT-6.1 Sol.
        AI illustration

        Asana's engineering post says keeping a browser agent's cache intact cut its cost 76x and made it 5x faster. OpenAI's page says the 76x compares the optimized agent on GPT-6.1 Sol with the original production setup on Model B.

        Members · 30 days free

        See what the evidence actually shows.

        Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

        1. At sign-up: 30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.
        2. Your trial ends 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage subscription, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.
        3. You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing hello@bskiller.com. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

        By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

        BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

        Open the evidence2 source pages

        The claim we checked

        Asana says keeping a browser agent's prompt cache intact cut its cost 76x.

        These are quoted receipts, not a count of independent investigations. Several reports may rely on the same original source.

        asana.com ↗
        How we cut a browser agent's cost 76x and made it 5x faster by keeping its cache intact
        asana.com ↗
        On GPT-6.1 Sol, the same agent cost 76x less and ran 5x faster, reading 89% of its input from cache.
        web.archive.org ↗
        averaged $0.47 in estimated model costs and about four minutes per run, 76x cheaper and 5x faster than the original production setup on Model B.
        asana.com ↗
        On Model B, the best condition cut cost per run 29x and ran 4x faster than the original production setup.
        web.archive.org ↗
        On GPT‑6.1 Sol alone, with the larger history budget, the new caching and screenshot policy reduced cost 4x, from $1.97 to $0.47 per run.
        web.archive.org ↗
        Each configuration performed the same task: collecting six fields for each of 32 books from a public demo catalog
        asana.com ↗
        Without batch pruning, caching the history at the larger budget cost more than not caching it on three of four models
        Open this check in the full collection →
        The idea, illustrated04

        Go inside the check.

          The full explanation appears when your reading access is confirmed.
          The finish line

          Edition complete

          You’re up to speed.

          That’s the 10 Oct 2026 briefing. Keep the useful bits. Leave the noise.

          Reading estimate: 813 words at 200 words per minute. Source quotes and the optional sections below add reading time.

          Get tomorrow's check in your inbox.

          One AI claim a night, checked against independent sources, receipts attached. Free.

          Free email updates. Unsubscribe any time.