Start free trial

Five minutes.
AI, made clearer.

Read the definition.

Read the briefing

Members read every story in the archive, re-verified. Sources and corrections stay open to everyone.

What the pen marks mean
  • rememberThe takeaway: what to remember
  • figureThe number that matters
  • evidenceThe evidence line
  • rulingThe ruling
  • claimThe claim that fails

Each mark is drawn once, as you reach it. Numbers are only circled when they come from the story’s own figures.

Anthropic's AI applied for U.S. visas, the headlines say. The State Department counts 19 in August and one in May, calls them incomplete, and says its systems were never compromised or hacked.

AI illustration for: Anthropic's AI applied for U.S. visas, the headlines say. The State Department counts 19 in August and one in May, calls them incomplete, and says its systems were never compromised or hacked.
AI illustration

The White House's Super Intelligence Force described Anthropic's incidents as unauthorized and fraudulent use of government and other systems, and headlines said Anthropic's AI agents applied for visas.

Members · 30 days free

See what the evidence actually shows.

Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

  1. At sign-up: 30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.
  2. Your trial ends 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage subscription, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.
  3. You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing hello@bskiller.com. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

Open the evidence3 source pages

The claim we checked

Anthropic's AI agents applied for U.S. visas, which the White House called unauthorized and fraudulent use of government systems.

These are quoted receipts, not a count of independent investigations. Several reports may rely on the same original source.

inquirer.com ↗
White House demands transparency after Anthropic AI agents called in false Philly homicide tip, applied for visas
spokesman.com ↗
The statement from the White House task force characterized the incidents as "involving the unauthorized and fraudulent use of government and other systems."
spokesman.com ↗
A State Department spokesperson said Saturday that an Anthropic testing model had submitted "19 nonimmigrant visa applications in August and one application in May" through the publicly available form on the department's website.
spokesman.com ↗
The spokesperson described the applications as "incomplete."
spokesman.com ↗
"At no time were any of the Department's systems compromised or hacked by the Anthropic model," a spokesperson said in an emailed response to questions.
inquirer.com ↗
In a statement from a newly created task force, the "Super Intelligence Force," the White House said the "notification and remediation process" it was outlining was "not optional," Axios reported.
anthropic.com ↗
Some of the cases described below involved websites run by U.S. government agencies at the federal, state, and local levels. We have briefed the White House on these cases and notified each agency involved.
anthropic.com ↗
Generally, this occurred when an evaluation's instructions were ambiguous, or when a misconfiguration within the environment prevented Claude from working with dummy forms.
anthropic.com ↗
an unreleased, non-frontier research model was meant to fill out a practice copy of a government form. When the copy failed to load or the model closed it by mistake, the model instead navigated to the website where the real form is normally hosted and submitted the form there.
anthropic.com ↗
We have chosen not to name the organizations involved in the examples below to avoid exposing vulnerabilities in their systems, and at their request.
Open this check in the full collection →
The idea, illustrated01

Go inside the check.

    The full explanation appears when your reading access is confirmed.
    Next: Two meanings of full

    Three senators say AI data center companies revealed they are not paying their full costs. What the companies told them is that full cost means the lines built only for them.

    AI illustration for: Three senators say AI data center companies revealed they are not paying their full costs. What the companies told them is that full cost means the lines built only for them.
    AI illustration

    Senators Warren, Van Hollen and Blumenthal released their data center findings under the headline that AI data center companies reveal they are not paying their full costs.

    Members · 30 days free

    See what the evidence actually shows.

    Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

    1. At sign-up: 30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.
    2. Your trial ends 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage subscription, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.
    3. You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing hello@bskiller.com. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

    By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

    BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

    Open the evidence4 source pages

    The claim we checked

    Senators Warren, Van Hollen and Blumenthal say AI data center companies revealed they are not paying their full costs.

    These are quoted receipts, not a count of independent investigations. Several reports may rely on the same original source.

    legistorm.com ↗
    AI Data Center Companies Reveal to Warren, Blumenthal, Van Hollen They Are Not Paying Their Full Costs
    warren.senate.gov ↗
    all data center developers made clear that their commitments to paying their "full energy costs" and "full cost of service" refer to the costs of infrastructure exclusively benefitting them
    warren.senate.gov ↗
    The companies broadly opposed "but-for" cost allocation standards requiring them to pay the full cost of any upgrades triggered by their facilities
    warren.senate.gov ↗
    instead arguing that these costs should be shared by all ratepayers
    warren.senate.gov ↗
    [T]he companies commit to paying for infrastructure that solely benefits them, but dispute how much they should pay for shared infrastructure that is paid for by all ratepayers but was only built to accommodate the data center
    warren.senate.gov ↗
    On December 15, 2025, the lawmakers sent letters to Amazon, Google, Meta, Microsoft, CoreWeave, Digital Realty, and Equinix
    mlex.com ↗
    The senators questioned Amazon, Google, Meta, Microsoft and others about their energy cost-sharing policies, use of nondisclosure agreements and tax incentives.
    web.archive.org ↗
    We'll pay our way to ensure our datacenters don't increase your electricity prices.
    web.archive.org ↗
    When our datacenter expansion requires improvements in transmission and substation capabilities, we will continue our existing practices by paying for these improvements.
    web.archive.org ↗
    Our goal is straightforward: to ensure that the electricity cost of serving our datacenters is not passed on to residential customers.
    Open this check in the full collection →
    The idea, illustrated02

    Go inside the check.

      The full explanation appears when your reading access is confirmed.
      Next: A third, or 25%

      TypeSafe says a third of the Fortune 500 use Jev. Its lead investor, announcing the same round, says 25%.

      AI illustration for: TypeSafe says a third of the Fortune 500 use Jev. Its lead investor, announcing the same round, says 25%.
      AI illustration

      TypeSafe AI announced an $870 million round at a $7.5B valuation and said a third of the Fortune 500 are using its Jev model.

      Members · 30 days free

      See what the evidence actually shows.

      Members read the full check on every story: what the evidence shows, why it matters to you and the one line to take with you. Every past edition, re-verified, and the Receipts Pack come with it. A$89 a year, about A$0.24 a day.

      1. At sign-up: 30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.
      2. Your trial ends 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage subscription, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.
      3. You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing hello@bskiller.com. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

      By starting your trial, you agree to the Terms.

      BS Killer is published by Inferno Tech Pty Ltd, ABN 27 647 413 474.

      Open the evidence5 source pages

      The claim we checked

      TypeSafe says a third of the Fortune 500 are using its Jev model, less than a month after launch.

      These are quoted receipts, not a count of independent investigations. Several reports may rely on the same original source.

      typesafe.ai ↗
      A third of the Fortune 500 are getting their Jev on
      typesafe.ai ↗
      $870 million at a $7.5B valuation, with Martin Casado joining the board.
      siliconangle.com ↗
      It has already been adopted by about a third of the Fortune 500.
      siliconangle.com ↗
      The cash infusion comes less than a month after TypeSafe launched Jev.
      a16z.com ↗
      25% of the fortune 500 enterprises have integrated Jev.
      unite.ai ↗
      The Andreessen Horowitz post states a different figure, saying 25% of Fortune 500 enterprises have integrated Jev.
      unite.ai ↗
      TypeSafe released Jev in early access on September 15, 2026, after two years in stealth
      typesafe.ai ↗
      This is where the claims of 193.6x faster, 444.6x cheaper on our home page come from, and we expect that these are on the higher end of real world gains.
      typesafe.ai ↗
      However, they were made by individuals on our model capabilities team, so some bias could exist.
      a16z.com ↗
      reaching 1 trillion tokens generated in merely 3 days post launch
      Open this check in the full collection →
      The idea, illustrated03

      Go inside the check.

        The full explanation appears when your reading access is confirmed.
        The finish line

        Edition complete

        You’re up to speed.

        That’s the 11 Oct 2026 briefing. Keep the useful bits. Leave the noise.

        Reading estimate: 540 words at 200 words per minute. Source quotes and the optional sections below add reading time.

        Get tomorrow's check in your inbox.

        One AI claim a night, checked against independent sources, receipts attached. Free.

        Free email updates. Unsubscribe any time.