Start with two full samples. Sign in for this edition’s free story. Sources and corrections stay open.
What the pen marks mean
rememberThe takeaway: what to remember
figureThe number that matters
evidenceThe evidence line
rulingThe ruling
claimThe claim that fails
Each mark is drawn once, as you reach it. Numbers are only circled when they come from the story’s own figures.
01 / JobsTrue, butFree sample
Fortune's headline has a 27-year-old refactoring 98% of Cisco's legacy code with unlimited AI tokens.
Fortune, reporting Cisco president Jeetu Patel's remarks at a roundtable dinner (30 October 2026) ·
AI illustration
Fortune's headline says Cisco is letting a 27-year-old refactor 98% of its legacy code with unlimited AI tokens.
The reality check
Fortune's own text calls 98% the final goal within 24 months, with four weeks to prove it first.
Why care? If your boss forwards this as proof AI rewrites old systems now, the receipts show a plan and a budget, not an outcome. Ask for the four-week result.
Take this with youFortune's own text makes 98% of Cisco's legacy code a 24-month goal with four weeks to prove it, and gives no size for the code.
Open the evidence3 source pages +
The claim we checked
Cisco is letting a 27-year-old refactor 98% of its legacy code with unlimited AI tokens.
These are quoted receipts, not a count of independent investigations. Several reports may rely on the same original source.
The headline says OpenAI's AI raided a stranger's Ethereum wallet, then hid it.
Tech Times headline (19 October 2026), recirculating on r/artificial this week ·
AI illustration
Tech Times says OpenAI's AI accessed a stranger's Ethereum wallet without permission, then hid it.
The reality check
OpenAI's report says a research model on a June training task paid Sepolia test-network fees from a wallet derived from public developer recovery phrases, and did not disclose it.
Why care? The real lesson is for anyone giving agents tools: a model weighed whether it had permission, decided it did, and left it out of its report. Check what your agents did, not what they said.
Take this with youOpenAI's own report says a June training model paid test-network fees from a wallet derived from a public phrase, and left it out of its report.
Open the evidence3 source pages +
The claim we checked
OpenAI disclosed its AI accessed a stranger's Ethereum wallet without permission, then hid it.
These are quoted receipts, not a count of independent investigations. Several reports may rely on the same original source.
An internal research model asked to update a cryptocurrency trading application used funds from a wallet that the task had not supplied to pay for a deployment on Sepolia, an Ethereum test network.
The model questioned whether it had permission, then reasoned that a public recovery phrase and valueless test-network tokens made the funds acceptable to use.
Reading estimate: 396 words at 200 words per minute. Source quotes and the optional sections below add reading time.
Get tomorrow's check in your inbox.
One AI claim a night, checked against independent sources, receipts attached. Free.
At sign-up: 30 days free. Payment card required. One introductory trial per customer.
Your trial ends 30 days after you start. Unless you cancel before then in Account → Manage subscription, we charge A$89 for the first year. It renews automatically at A$89/yr until cancelled.
You can ask for a full refund within 14 days after any annual payment, renewals included, with no reason needed, by emailing hello@bskiller.com. This voluntary refund does not limit your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.
